Messages in this thread | | | From | Ohad Ben-Cohen <> | Date | Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:01:17 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block |
| |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> wrote: > So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'. The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more generic (like ethernet or pci). So what would you suggest?
How about 'hwlock' ?
This should be generic enough to cover all instances of hardware locks (we already know hwspinlock isn't generic enough, as there are some mutex-like hardware locks which doesn't require busy looping).
| |