lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block
From
Date

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'. The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more generic (like ethernet or pci). So what would you suggest?
>
> How about 'hwlock' ?
>
> This should be generic enough to cover all instances of hardware locks
> (we already know hwspinlock isn't generic enough, as there are some
> mutex-like hardware locks which doesn't require busy looping).

hwlock sounds good to me, I'll go with it.

- k

--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-13 17:01    [W:0.054 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site