Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Richard Genoud <> | Subject | [PATCH resend] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous | Date | Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:17:29 +0200 |
| |
We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting capability is chosen.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com> Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> --- It seems that this patch has been forgotten (even by me) for some months. (was already acked by Josh then) Reference of the discussion leading to this patch: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/46342
drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c index 2d23d29..2415cdc 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, return err_no; } - if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap || + if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap || sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size) dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n"); -- 1.7.10.4
| |