lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [lm-sensors] 3.10: NCT6776F sensor question with Supermicro X9SRL-F motherboard
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 12:08:17PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:linux@roeck-us.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:42 AM
> To: Justin Piszcz
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 3.10: NCT6776F sensor question with Supermicro
> X9SRL-F motherboard
>
> [ .. ]
>
> This is surprising and might be where the alarm comes from. What output do
> you
> get if you load the coretemp driver ?
>
> coretemp-isa-0000
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> Physical id 0: +38.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
> Core 0: +36.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
> Core 1: +35.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
> Core 2: +35.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
> Core 3: +34.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
> Core 4: +37.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
> Core 5: +38.0 C (high = +81.0 C, crit = +91.0 C)
>
Can you install superiotool and run "sudo superiotool -V -e" ?
I would like to see raw data from the superio chip.

> > PCH_CHIP_TEMP: +0.0 C
> > PCH_CPU_TEMP: +0.0 C
> > PCH_MCH_TEMP: +0.0 C
> > intrusion0: ALARM
> > intrusion1: ALARM
>
> Are those not connected ?
>
> The intrusion headers are not connected, also, I have not dug into it but
> when you try to ignore the PECI or those PCH* lm_sensors seems to ignore the
> rule.
>
> sensors3.conf:
> ignore PCH_CHIP_TEMP
> ignore PCH_CPU_TEMP
> ignore PCH_MCH_TEMP
>
You have to specify the raw attribute names, not the symbolic ones.
You see the raw attribute names with "sensors -u".

> $ sensors |tail -n 4
> PCH_CHIP_TEMP: +0.0 C
> PCH_CPU_TEMP: +0.0 C
> PCH_MCH_TEMP: +0.0 C
>
> Ignoring intrusion works though:
> ignore intrusion0
> ignore intrusion1
>
Does the board have intrusion detection headers ? If so, you could close
(bridge) the header(s) which should get rid of the alarm.

Thanks,
Guenter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-03 19:21    [W:0.171 / U:0.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site