Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:10:16 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] |
| |
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Unless I totally misunderstood, the thread is talking about letting > established bindings change with each new kernel version. I am > opposed to that.
No, nobody is really saying that is a particularly good idea. There is some debate about how we work out what an established binding is but there's no serious suggestion that we don't want stable bindings. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |