Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:04:39 +0200 (CEST) | From | Lukáš Czerner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] ext4: Allow punch hole with bigalloc enabled |
| |
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:14:54 -0400 > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> > To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, > akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] ext4: Allow punch hole with bigalloc enabled > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 06:37:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > In commits 5f95d21fb6f2aaa52830e5b7fb405f6c71d3ab85 and > > 30bc2ec9598a1b156ad75217f2e7d4560efdeeab we've reworked punch_hole > > implementation and there is noting holding us back from using punch hole > > on file system with bigalloc feature enabled. > > > > This has been tested with fsx and xfstests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> > > This patch is causing a test failure with bigalloc enabled with the > xfstests shared/298. > > Since it's at the end of the invalidate page range tests, I'm going to > drop this patch for now. Could you take a look at this?
Hi Ted,
sorry for the delay, I've been on vacation last week so I am trying to catch on the recent development :) I'll take a look at it hopefully this week. Thanks for letting me know.
-Lukas
> > Thanks!! > > - Ted > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
| |