Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:43:05 -0500 | From | Scott Wood <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] fsl_pmc: update device bindings |
| |
On 04/19/2013 05:47:38 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: > From: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt | 59 > +++++++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt > index 07256b7..f1f749f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt > @@ -9,15 +9,20 @@ Properties: > > "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is > compatible. "fsl,mpc8536-pmc" should also be listed for any chip > - whose PMC is compatible, and implies deep-sleep capability. > + whose PMC is compatible, and implies deep-sleep capability and > + wake on user defined packet(wakeup on ARP). > + > + "fsl,p1022-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is > + compatible, and implies lossless Ethernet capability during sleep. > > "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is > compatible; all statements below that apply to "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" > also > apply to "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc". > > Compatibility does not include bit assignments in > SCCR/PMCDR/DEVDISR; these > - bit assignments are indicated via the sleep specifier in each > device's > - sleep property. > + bit assignments are indicated via the clock nodes. Device which > has a > + controllable clock source should have a "fsl,pmc-handle" property > pointing > + to the clock node.
Please respond to the feedback given on v1: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/147177/
Also indicate, below the ---, what has changed from previous versions.
-Scott
| |