Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:20:56 +0300 | From | Oleksandr Kozaruk <> | Subject | Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032 |
| |
On 06/13/2013 11:17 AM, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM, <gg@slimlogic.co.uk > <mailto:gg@slimlogic.co.uk>> wrote: > > > > On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: > >>> > >>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk <mailto:gg@slimlogic.co.uk>> > >>> > >>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by > >>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to > >>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in > line with > >>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion. > >>> > >>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code. > >> > >> > >> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as > >> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID > >> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might > >> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason. > > > > > > I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run! > > > > Graeme > > Hello Mark, Graeme, > > Taking in account that: > - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible; > - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes > to twl6032 is not known; > - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found > on ti.com <http://ti.com> > > So, what do you think, can this change be accepted? > <http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt> Sorry for spamming - had problems with mail server.
| |