lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032
On 06/13/2013 11:17 AM, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM, <gg@slimlogic.co.uk
> <mailto:gg@slimlogic.co.uk>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk <mailto:gg@slimlogic.co.uk>>
> >>>
> >>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
> >>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
> >>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in
> line with
> >>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
> >>>
> >>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
> >>
> >>
> >> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
> >> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
> >> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
> >> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
> >
> >
> > I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
> >
> > Graeme
>
> Hello Mark, Graeme,
>
> Taking in account that:
> - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
> - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes
> to twl6032 is not known;
> - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found
> on ti.com <http://ti.com>
>
> So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?
> <http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt>
Sorry for spamming - had problems with mail server.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-13 13:41    [W:0.051 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site