Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:21:01 +0300 | From | Oleksandr Kozaruk <> | Subject | Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032 |
| |
On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: > On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: >>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk> >>> >>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by >>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to >>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in >>> line with >>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion. >>> >>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code. >> >> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as >> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID >> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might >> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason. > > I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run! > > Graeme > Hello Mark, Graeme,
Taking in account that: - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible; - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to twl6032 is not known; - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on ti.com <http://ti.com>
So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?
// I apologize for sending personal e-mails, not to the mail list
| |