Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 May 2013 09:30:20 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: USB_EHCI_HCD needs USB_PHY and NOP_USB_XCEIV | From | Adrien Vergé <> |
| |
Dear Arnd and Roger, thank you for your answers.
2013/5/28 Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> > Selecting NOP_USB_XCEIV is wrong as it in turn depends on USB_PHY. > > I'm not for depends as it would hide USB_EHCI_HCD_OMAP in menuconfig. > I'm for explicitly selecting both, as it makes the user's life much > easier. > But I'm afraid maintainers might object to that. > > The other option is to enable the required drivers in omap2plus_defconfig. > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/97899
This seems a good idea to me, since many OMAP users boot with NFS and need USB directly working (Ethernet over USB).
> Maybe you could just resend that patch after addressing Kevin's comments?
It's sad that USB_EHCI_HCD is too instable to be added in omap2plus_defconfig. Still, USB_PHY and NOP_USB_XCEIV are needed since v3.10 for USB support (and harmless): should I send a patch adding those two in omap2plus_defconfig?
Cheers, Adrien
| |