Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 May 2013 10:49:28 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v11 |
| |
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> v11: Rebase to perf/core. Fix extra regs. Rename INTX.
Actually, you did not do what I asked you to do, to rename INTX to IN_TX, you still kept the 'INTX' pattern that is confusingly similar to interrupts related names like 'INT3'.
I still see, even your latest patch, this:
+#define HSW_INTX (1ULL << 32) +#define HSW_INTX_CHECKPOINTED (1ULL << 33)
Why are you ignoring maintainer requests, repeatedly?
It woulnd't be a big issue and I'd do the rename myself if this wasn't a repeat pattern of passive-aggressive obstruction from you spanning several years, resisting or obstructing maintainer feedback whenever you can ...
Thanks,
Ingo
| |