lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v11

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> v11: Rebase to perf/core. Fix extra regs. Rename INTX.

Actually, you did not do what I asked you to do, to rename INTX to IN_TX,
you still kept the 'INTX' pattern that is confusingly similar to
interrupts related names like 'INT3'.

I still see, even your latest patch, this:

+#define HSW_INTX (1ULL << 32)
+#define HSW_INTX_CHECKPOINTED (1ULL << 33)

Why are you ignoring maintainer requests, repeatedly?

It woulnd't be a big issue and I'd do the rename myself if this wasn't a
repeat pattern of passive-aggressive obstruction from you spanning several
years, resisting or obstructing maintainer feedback whenever you can ...

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-02 11:21    [W:0.199 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site