lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2
Date
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 07:45:45 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 May 2013 05:10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > Well, I actually meant "can you please verify your belief?". :-)
> >
> > And that's because I'm wondering why the zero-day build testing doesn't
> > catch this problem. Apparently, it doesn't build .configs with cpufreq
> > governors configured as modules, although I believe it does test
> > "make allmodconfig" for a couple of architectures at least. What gives?
>
> My assumption was wrong. Actually cpufreq_governor.c is never compiled
> as module, but cpufreq_ondemand is...
>
> And this routine isn't used from cpufreq_ondemand but cpufreq_governor..
>
> But we were lucky that we didn't get a error here and EXPORT_SYMBOL
> is still required :)

Although not necessarily 3.10 material I suppose?

Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-18 11:41    [W:0.090 / U:1.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site