lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2
From
On 18 May 2013 05:10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> Well, I actually meant "can you please verify your belief?". :-)
>
> And that's because I'm wondering why the zero-day build testing doesn't
> catch this problem. Apparently, it doesn't build .configs with cpufreq
> governors configured as modules, although I believe it does test
> "make allmodconfig" for a couple of architectures at least. What gives?

My assumption was wrong. Actually cpufreq_governor.c is never compiled
as module, but cpufreq_ondemand is...

And this routine isn't used from cpufreq_ondemand but cpufreq_governor..

But we were lucky that we didn't get a error here and EXPORT_SYMBOL
is still required :)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-18 04:21    [W:1.448 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site