Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 May 2013 07:45:45 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2 | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 18 May 2013 05:10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > Well, I actually meant "can you please verify your belief?". :-) > > And that's because I'm wondering why the zero-day build testing doesn't > catch this problem. Apparently, it doesn't build .configs with cpufreq > governors configured as modules, although I believe it does test > "make allmodconfig" for a couple of architectures at least. What gives?
My assumption was wrong. Actually cpufreq_governor.c is never compiled as module, but cpufreq_ondemand is...
And this routine isn't used from cpufreq_ondemand but cpufreq_governor..
But we were lucky that we didn't get a error here and EXPORT_SYMBOL is still required :)
| |