Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCHv3 2/6] arm: Add device trees for TI-Nspire | Date | Wed, 15 May 2013 16:10:22 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 12 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote: > + > + timer0: timer@900C0000 { > + reg = <0x900C0000 0x1000>; > + > + clocks = <&timer_clk>; > + clock-names = "timer_clk"; > + }; > + > + timer1: timer@900D0000 { > + reg = <0x900D0000 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <19>; > + > + clocks = <&timer_clk>; > + clock-names = "timer_clk"; > + };
> + clocks = <&apb_pclk>; > + clock-names = "apb_pclk"; > + };
Why do you provide "clock-names" here? Do those devices have multiple clock inputs? It's normally easier to just use the default clock input.
Arnd
| |