lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHv3 2/6] arm: Add device trees for TI-Nspire
Date
On Sunday 12 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote:
> +
> + timer0: timer@900C0000 {
> + reg = <0x900C0000 0x1000>;
> +
> + clocks = <&timer_clk>;
> + clock-names = "timer_clk";
> + };
> +
> + timer1: timer@900D0000 {
> + reg = <0x900D0000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <19>;
> +
> + clocks = <&timer_clk>;
> + clock-names = "timer_clk";
> + };


> + clocks = <&apb_pclk>;
> + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> + };

Why do you provide "clock-names" here? Do those devices have multiple
clock inputs? It's normally easier to just use the default clock
input.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-15 17:01    [W:0.183 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site