Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 May 2013 22:35:36 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/8]: use runnable load avg in balance |
| |
On 05/14/2013 05:34 PM, Paul Turner wrote: >> > >> > We also tried to include blocked load avg in balance. but find many benchmark >> > performance dropping. Guess the too bigger cpu load drive task to be waken >> > on remote CPU, and cause wrong decision in periodic balance. > Fundamentally, I think we should be exploring this space.
I thought something of this. but can not figure out a direction or stand by some theories. > > While it's perhaps not surprising that it's not a drop-in, since the > current code was tuned always considering the instaneous balance, it > seems the likely path to increased balance stability. > > Although, if the code is yielding substantive benefits in its current > form we should consider merging it in the interim.
Sorry, I can not follow you here. >
-- Thanks Alex
| |