Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 May 2013 08:44:16 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [patch v6 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg |
| |
On 05/30/2013 01:00 AM, Jason Low wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 23:17 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> blocked_load_avg sometime is too heavy and far bigger than runnable load >> avg. that make balance make wrong decision. So better don't consider it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> > > Hi Alex, > > I have been testing these patches with a Java server workload on an 8 > socket (80 core) box with Hyperthreading enabled, and I have been seeing > good results with these patches. > > When using a 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with patches 1-8, there was about a 40% > improvement in performance of the workload compared to when using the > vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with no patches. When using a 3.10-rc2 tip > kernel with just patches 1-7, the performance improvement of the > workload over the vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel was about 25%. > > Tested-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> >
That is impressive!
Thanks a lot for your testing! Just curious, what the benchmark are you using? :)
> Thanks, > Jason >
-- Thanks Alex
| |