lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Query] Performance degradation with memory compaction (on QC chip-set)
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 08:00:26PM -0700, PINTU KUMAR wrote:
> Dear Mel Gorman,
>
> I have one question about memory compaction.
> Kernel version: kernel-3.4 (ARM)
> Chipset: Qual-Comm MSM8930 dual-core.
>
> We wanted to enable CONFIG_COMPACTION for our product with kernel-3.4.
> But QC commented that, enabling compaction on their chip-set is causing performance degradation for some streaming scenarios (from the beginning).
>
> I wanted to know is this possible always?
> We used compaction with exynos processor and did not observe any performance degradation.
>

I suspect one of their drivers are using high-order allocations and
hitting compaction as a result. Compaction is not guaranteed to cause
overhead but if it's in use then the scanning and copying overhead can
cause problems.

> Please let me know your comments.
> It will be helpful to decide on enabling compaction or not.
>

Depends on workload and drivers.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-05-13 11:21    [W:0.021 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site