Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 May 2013 22:03:12 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks |
| |
On 05/09/2013 01:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > > I reviewed the cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg code path, no clear abnormal found. > Seems the blocked load avg is fit current balance rules.
Sorry, I mean, the blocked load avg doesn't fit current balance rules. The reason is blow, any comments on this? > Sometime the blocked load far bigger than runnable load. The blocked_load_avg > has a long time effect(more than half weight in 32ms), that drives wakeup task to other > cpus not locate, and give unnecessary load in periodic balance, isn't it?
-- Thanks Alex
| |