Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:24:46 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86, kdump: Change crashkernel_high/low= to crashkernel=;high/low |
| |
On 04/09/2013 01:05 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> So crashkernel=X@Y;high is a valid syntax? Looks like we will reserve >> X amount of RAM at base Y and ignore "high" or "low". > > yes, we should reject them. >
What if there isn't X amount of RAM available at base Y?
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |