Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:00:20 -0700 | From | Kent Overstreet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next 1/3] bcache: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h> |
| |
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 02:15:49PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > Nope - looks like __WARN() doesn't exist if CONFIG_BUG=n, whoops. > > > > Adding this to the queue: > > > > commit 796c213186b850b3e6e8d5fd5799b0fd74721ea3 > > Author: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> > > Date: Wed Mar 27 12:47:45 2013 -0700 > > > > bcache: Use WARN_ONCE() instead of __WARN() > > > > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c > > index d4f2164..cb4578a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c > > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c > > @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ struct bkey *bch_btree_iter_next(struct btree_iter *iter) > > iter->data->k = bkey_next(iter->data->k); > > > > if (iter->data->k > iter->data->end) { > > - __WARN(); > > + WARN_ONCE(1, "bset was corrupt!\n"); > > iter->data->k = iter->data->end; > > } > > > > This problem still persists in linux-next as of today, how is this fix > being pushed?
Sorry for the delay, I've been moving all last week - I just sent Jens a pull request with the latest bcache fixes, though.
| |