Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Apr 2013 10:46:31 +0800 | From | Michael Wang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle |
| |
On 04/22/2013 06:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for > wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to > select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all? > > Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing > wake_affine()?
Is it time for us to make the decision now?
Forgive me for urge the progress, but I really confused what is stopping us from adopt the throttle approach...
Is there any other option more simple, safe and faster?
Regards, Michael Wang
> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
| |