| Date | Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:35:21 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for > wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to > select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all? > > Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing > wake_affine()?
I'd suggest doing a patch that does:
s/SD_WAKE_AFFINE/0*SD_WAKE_AFFINE
in all the relevant toplogy.h files, but otherwise keep the logic in place. That way it's easy to revert.
Thanks,
Ingo
|