lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for
> wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to
> select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all?
>
> Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing
> wake_affine()?

I'd suggest doing a patch that does:

s/SD_WAKE_AFFINE/0*SD_WAKE_AFFINE

in all the relevant toplogy.h files, but otherwise keep the logic in
place. That way it's easy to revert.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-22 13:21    [W:0.339 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site