lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 00/12] Driver for Si476x series of chips
From
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:58:26AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> Driver for Si476x series of chips
>>
>> This is a eight version of the patchset originaly posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/590
>>
>> Second version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/5/598
>>
>> Third version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/510
>>
>> Fourth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/18/572
>>
>> Fifth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/45
>>
>> Sixth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/257
>>
>> Seventh version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/27/22
>>
>> Eighth version of the patch was posted here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/891
>>
>> To save everyone's time I'll repost the original description of it:
>>
>> This patchset contains a driver for a Silicon Laboratories 476x series
>> of radio tuners. The driver itself is implemented as an MFD devices
>> comprised of three parts:
>> 1. Core device that provides all the other devices with basic
>> functionality and locking scheme.
>> 2. Radio device that translates between V4L2 subsystem requests into
>> Core device commands.
>> 3. Codec device that does similar to the earlier described task, but
>> for ALSA SoC subsystem.
>>
>> v9 of this driver has following changes:
>> - MFD part of the driver no longer depends on the header file added
>> by the radio driver(media/si476x.h) which should potential
>> restore the bisectability of the patches
> I applied all the MFD patches from this patchset (All 4 first ones), plus a
> follow up one for fixing the i2c related warning.
> I also squashed the REGMAP_I2C dependency into patch #4.
> It's all in mfd-next now, I'd appreciate if you could double check it's all
> fine.
>
> Mauro will take the rest, we made sure there won't be any merge conflict
> between our trees.
>

Thanks, I will try to test it today or tomorrow(20/04) at the latest.

> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> --
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-20 00:21    [W:0.150 / U:0.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site