Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:13:05 +0800 | From | Tang Chen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmemmap: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node/memory case |
| |
On 04/11/2013 11:10 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Tang Chen<tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> >> 3. If we add flag to memblock, we can mark different memory. And I remember >> you mentioned before that we can use memblock to reserve local node data >> for node-life-cycle data, like vmemmap, pagetable. >> >> So are you doing the similar work now ? > > No, i did not start it yet. > >> >> If not, I think I can merge it into mine, and push a new patch-set with >> hot-add, hot-remove code modified to support putting vmemmap, pagetable, >> pgdat, page_cgroup, ..., on local node. > > Need to have it separated with moving_zone. > > 1. rework memblock to keep alive all the way for hotplug usage. > 2. put pagetable and vmemap on the local node range with help of memblock. >
OK,thanks for the comments. I'll merge it into my work and post an RFC patch-set soon.
Thanks. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |