Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:10:28 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmemmap: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node/memory case | From | Yinghai Lu <> |
| |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > 3. If we add flag to memblock, we can mark different memory. And I remember > you mentioned before that we can use memblock to reserve local node data > for node-life-cycle data, like vmemmap, pagetable. > > So are you doing the similar work now ?
No, i did not start it yet.
> > If not, I think I can merge it into mine, and push a new patch-set with > hot-add, hot-remove code modified to support putting vmemmap, pagetable, > pgdat, page_cgroup, ..., on local node.
Need to have it separated with moving_zone.
1. rework memblock to keep alive all the way for hotplug usage. 2. put pagetable and vmemap on the local node range with help of memblock.
Thanks
Yinghai
| |