lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[ 076/153] NLM: Ensure that we resend all pending blocking locks after a reclaim
3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

commit 666b3d803a511fbc9bc5e5ea8ce66010cf03ea13 upstream.

Currently, nlmclnt_lock will break out of the for(;;) loop when
the reclaimer wakes up the blocking lock thread by setting
nlm_lck_denied_grace_period. This causes the lock request to fail
with an ENOLCK error.
The intention was always to ensure that we resend the lock request
after the grace period has expired.

Reported-by: Wangyuan Zhang <Wangyuan.Zhang@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
@@ -551,6 +551,9 @@ again:
status = nlmclnt_block(block, req, NLMCLNT_POLL_TIMEOUT);
if (status < 0)
break;
+ /* Resend the blocking lock request after a server reboot */
+ if (resp->status == nlm_lck_denied_grace_period)
+ continue;
if (resp->status != nlm_lck_blocked)
break;
}



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-04 05:41    [W:0.540 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site