lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: do cpufreq_cpu_put() corresponding to cpufreq_cpu_get
Date
On Friday, March 22, 2013 04:47:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 March 2013 16:42, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> In cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs() we aren't balancing calls to cpufreq_cpu_get()
> >> with cpufreq_cpu_put(). This will never let us have ref count to policy->kobj as
> >> zero.
> >
> > Rafael,
> >
> > Since this prevents booting on our hardware (we unregister and
> > re-register the cpufreq driver to account for virtual cores), will
> > this be considered as a hotfix for 3.9?
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
>
> Sorry i forgot to mention, this should be pushed for next rc.

Well, -rc5 is a realistic target.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-22 13:01    [W:0.063 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site