Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:47:29 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: do cpufreq_cpu_put() corresponding to cpufreq_cpu_get | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 22 March 2013 16:42, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: >> In cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs() we aren't balancing calls to cpufreq_cpu_get() >> with cpufreq_cpu_put(). This will never let us have ref count to policy->kobj as >> zero. > > Rafael, > > Since this prevents booting on our hardware (we unregister and > re-register the cpufreq driver to account for virtual cores), will > this be considered as a hotfix for 3.9? > >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Sorry i forgot to mention, this should be pushed for next rc.
| |