Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | kpark3469@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH v2] tracepoints: prevents null probe from being added | Date | Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:34:41 +0900 |
| |
From: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add_probe function allows a null probe function. And, this may lead to unexpected result since the number of probe functions in an entry can be counted by checking whether probe is null or not in for-loop. This patch prevents the null probe from being added. In tracepoint_entry_remove_probe function, checking probe parameter within for-loop is moved out for code efficiency leaving the null probe feature which removes all probe functions in the entry.
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> --- kernel/tracepoint.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c index 0c05a45..7d69348 100644 --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c @@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ tracepoint_entry_add_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry, int nr_probes = 0; struct tracepoint_func *old, *new; - WARN_ON(!probe); + if (WARN_ON(!probe)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); debug_print_probes(entry); old = entry->funcs; @@ -152,13 +153,15 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry, debug_print_probes(entry); /* (N -> M), (N > 1, M >= 0) probes */ - for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) { - if (!probe || - (old[nr_probes].func == probe && - old[nr_probes].data == data)) - nr_del++; + if (probe) { + for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) { + if (old[nr_probes].func == probe && + old[nr_probes].data == data) + nr_del++; + } } + /* If probe is NULL, all funcs in the entry will be removed. */ if (nr_probes - nr_del == 0) { /* N -> 0, (N > 1) */ entry->funcs = NULL; @@ -173,8 +176,7 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry, if (new == NULL) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); for (i = 0; old[i].func; i++) - if (probe && - (old[i].func != probe || old[i].data != data)) + if (old[i].func != probe || old[i].data != data) new[j++] = old[i]; new[nr_probes - nr_del].func = NULL; entry->refcount = nr_probes - nr_del; -- 1.7.1
| |