Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:55:49 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] DMA: OF: Check properties value before running be32_to_cpup() on it | From | Amit Kucheria <> |
| |
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:48:50PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 21 March 2013 15:16, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:18:20PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> >> In of_dma_controller_register() routine we are calling of_get_property() as an >> >> parameter to be32_to_cpup(). In case the property doesn't exist we will get a >> >> crash. >> >> >> >> This patch changes this code to check if we got a valid property first and then >> >> runs be32_to_cpup() on it. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> My mails are broken, i have pushed this patch here: >> > I noticed you used git send-email. Usually it will send patch properly >> > independent of whatever MUA you use. >> >> Probably not!! Its the famous (Infamous) Microsoft exchange server working in >> background and it breaks mails without treating mails coming from git send-email >> specially :) > I have seen usually receiving patches is a problem, not sending. at least at my > work place till now my sent patches have not been broken but what I receive has > thus forcing me to use non exchange accounts for receiving email but somehow situation > is better for receiving too :) > -- > ~Vinod >> >> > So I have the patch and its applied now :) >> >> I have seen this kind of discrimination on breaking patches based on the size of >> patch. If its very small (like this one), you may get a unbroken patch >> but if the size >> is a bit large then nobody can save you :)
I've seen the Exchange bug in both forms[1] - munging incoming patches as well as outgoing ones. It almost feels like the Exchange team's benevolent ploy to get companies to migrate away from Exchange so they can end-of-life those servers and stop developing Exchange further for the general betterment of humankind.[2]
[1] Since as far back as 8 years ago! [2] That or they get bonuses based on how much they disrupt open source communities. ;-)
| |