lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/9] perf util: Get rid of malloc_or_die() in trace-event-read.c
Date
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:55:02 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:50:02 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:53 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >> free(version);
>> >> @@ -331,11 +354,12 @@ ssize_t trace_report(int fd, struct pevent **ppevent, bool __repipe)
>> >>
>> >> page_size = read4(pevent);
>> >>
>> >> - read_header_files(pevent);
>> >> - read_ftrace_files(pevent);
>> >> - read_event_files(pevent);
>> >> - read_proc_kallsyms(pevent);
>> >> - read_ftrace_printk(pevent);
>> >> + if (read_header_files(pevent) ||
>> >> + read_ftrace_files(pevent) ||
>> >> + read_event_files(pevent) ||
>> >> + read_proc_kallsyms(pevent) ||
>> >> + read_ftrace_printk(pevent))
>> >> + goto out;
>> >
>> > I think I like the err += func() and check for err < 0, better.
>>
>> Okay, I'll change them to err |= func() style if you're fine as Peter
>> suggested.
>
> += or |= I'm not picky ;-)

Ah, one thing I also care was the short-circuit logic. I think we don't
need to call later functions if one fails, do we?

Thanks,
Namhyung


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-03-20 04:41    [W:0.069 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site