Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:13:57 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: New MFD tree for linux-next |
| |
Hi Samuel,
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:11:02 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:45:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch? > > > I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge > > > window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree. > > > > I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch > > of ...sameo/mfd-next.git". If that has changed, please let me know. > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was not clear enough: mfd-next master is > replacing mfd-2.6 for-next and mfd-fixes master is replacing mfd-2.6 for-linus. > So no need to pull mfd-next for-next. > > I deleted all branches but master from both mfd-next and mfd-fixes, so things > should be clearer now.
OK, I will fix this up for tomorrow.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |