Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:45:20 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: New MFD tree for linux-next |
| |
Hi Samuel,
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch? > I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge > window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree.
I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch of ...sameo/mfd-next.git". If that has changed, please let me know.
> > What branch should I use of that? > Ah, I didn't see that the remote tree still carries the mfd-2.6 branches, I'll > remove them. > Please use master.
OK. I will do that from tomorrow.
> > BTW, those two trees look very similar (in fact "diff -u <(git ls-remote > > mfd) <(git ls-remote mfd-fixes)" only shows a couple of differences in > > all the refs). You do realise that I can use 2 different branches of one > > tree, right (as can others)? > I understand that :) But using 2 trees rather than 2 separate branches is more > convenient to my personal workflow.
No worries.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |