Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:43:08 +0700 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ipc: do not hold ipc lock more than necessary | From | Emmanuel Benisty <> |
| |
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> wrote: > The following set of not-thoroughly-tested patches are based on the > discussion of holding the ipc lock unnecessarily, such as for permissions > and security checks: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/28/540 > > Patch 0/1: Introduces new functions, analogous to ipc_lock and ipc_lock_check > in the ipc utility code, allowing to obtain the ipc object without holding the lock. > > Patch 0/2: Use the new functions and only acquire the ipc lock when needed.
Not sure how much a work in progress this is but my machine dies immediately when I start chromium, crappy mobile phone picture here: http://i.imgur.com/S0hfPz3.jpg
Thanks.
| |