lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] pm: make PM macros more smart
On Sun 2013-12-15 11:25:08, David Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 06:51:12PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2013-12-12 21:18:23, David Cohen wrote:
> > > This patch makes SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() more
> > > smart.
> > >
> > > Despite those macros check for '#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP/RUNTIME' to avoid
> > > setting the callbacks when such #ifdef's aren't defined, they don't
> > > handle compiler to avoid messages like that:
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:200:12: warning: ???xhci_plat_suspend??? defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:208:12: warning: ???xhci_plat_resume??? defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > >
> > > As result, those macros get rid of #ifdef's when setting callbacks but
> > > not when implementing them.
> > >
> > > With this patch, drivers using SET_*_PM_OPS() macros don't need to #ifdef
> > > the callbacks implementation as well.
> >
> > Well... Interesting trickery, but it means that resulting kernel
> > will be bigge due to the dead functions no?
>
> Actually, it doesn't get bigger. Before sending the patch I did this
> dummy test app:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> #define USE_IT_OR_LOOSE_IT(fn) ((void *)((unsigned long)(fn) - (unsigned long)(fn)))
>
> #ifdef MAKE_ME_NULL
> static int func1(int a)
> {
> printf("Hey!!\n");
> return 0;
> }
> #endif

I thought that point of this patch series was getting rid of the
#ifdefs around the function...? Now I'm confused.

> struct global_data {
> int (*func)(int);
> };
>
> static struct global_data gd = {
> #ifdef MAKE_ME_NULL
> .func = USE_IT_OR_LOOSE_IT(func1),

If you have ifdef around the function, why do you need magic here? Why
not

.func = func1

?

Basically the warning tells you that you want the ifdef around the
function, too... (Otherwise you waste space). That seems like good
warning.

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-12-20 21:21    [W:0.369 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site