Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Doug Anderson <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: core: Make dt "timeout-sec" property work on drivers w/out min/max | Date | Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:22:52 -0800 |
| |
It is valid for a watchdog driver to have 0 for a "min" and "max" timeout if the driver doesn't need the core to enforce the concepts of min and max. The s3c2410_wdt driver is one such driver. Specifically it can be hard for that driver to come up with a static "max" on all platforms without a lot more information since the input clock on S3C2410 and S3C2440 can change with DVFS.
As written, watchdog_init_timeout() will not ever read "timeout-sec" on these drivers since watchdog_timeout_invalid() will _never_ return true. Change to not consider a timeout_parm of 0 as valid even if min/max aren't specified by the driver. Also handle the case when there is no min/max and no "timeout-sec" property.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> --- drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c index 461336c..cec9b55 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int watchdog_init_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, watchdog_check_min_max_timeout(wdd); /* try to get the timeout module parameter first */ - if (!watchdog_timeout_invalid(wdd, timeout_parm)) { + if (!watchdog_timeout_invalid(wdd, timeout_parm) && timeout_parm) { wdd->timeout = timeout_parm; return ret; } @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int watchdog_init_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, if (dev == NULL || dev->of_node == NULL) return ret; of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "timeout-sec", &t); - if (!watchdog_timeout_invalid(wdd, t)) + if (!watchdog_timeout_invalid(wdd, t) && t) wdd->timeout = t; else ret = -EINVAL; -- 1.8.4.1
| |