Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:21:27 +0100 | From | Sebastian Reichel <> | Subject | Re: [RFCv2 3/3] ARM: dts: N900: Add SSI information |
| |
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:38:59PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> [130915 13:56]: > > + > > +Example for Nokia N900: > > + > > +ssi-controller@48058000 { > > + compatible = "ti,omap3-ssi"; > > + ti,hwmods = "ssi"; > > + > > + reg = <0x48058000 0x1000>, > > + <0x48059000 0x1000>; > > + reg-names = "sys", > > + "gdd"; > > + > > + interrupts = <55>; > > + interrupt-names = "gdd_mpu"; > > + > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges; > > + > > + ssi-port@0 { > > + compatible = "ti,omap3-ssi-port"; > > + > > + reg = <0x4805a000 0x800>, > > + <0x4805a800 0x800>; > > + reg-names = "tx", > > + "rx"; > > + > > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > > + interrupts = <51>, > > + <52>; > > + interrupt-names = "mpu_irq0", > > + "mpu_irq1"; > > + > > + ti,ssi-cawake-gpio = <&gpio5 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 151 */ > > + } > > +} > > These should be in the omap3.dtsi file and not nested but separate. I'm almost > certain that these are completely independent hardware modules and this > means they can live their own PM life independently. > > So can you please do a minimal patch for omap3.dtsi that just sets up > the standard resources separately for both modules the same way we have > for other hardware modules in omap3.dtsi do? > > One of them should be called ssi, no idea what the other module name should > be as those register ranges show up as reserved in the docs I have.
In the public documentation of the omaps all SSI related stuff is missing and memory areas are marked as reserved. I could not find out how to receive the NDA version, so the following is purely speculation based on the code.
If I understand it right the HW looks like this:
+-----------------+ | GDD (DMA) | <- this one is currently called ssi-controller +--------+--------+ | Port 1 | Port 2 | <- these are currently called ssi-port +--------+--------+
I think the GDD part must be enabled while Port 1 or Port 2 is enabled. The last RFC driver from Carlos did not even split up the irq/memory areas into different platform devices, but just requested all of them in one ssi platform device.
> The other binding pieces can be added later on as they get are ready.
Sure. They are almost finished btw. I was able to get a gsm network scan.
-- Sebastian [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |