Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:31:34 +0100 | From | boris brezillon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 8/9] ARM: at91/dt: add new at91rm9200ek_mmc board |
| |
On 20/11/2013 16:02, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 14:37 Wed 28 Aug , Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> Add a new at91rm9200ek_mmc board (based on at91rm9200ek board) which enables >> mmc0/slot0. > no for multiple dts > > this need to handle at user space level
You mean, by controlling the regulator using the sysfs interface, or by loading only the appropriate driver ?
What if both drivers are loaded (or not compiled as modules) ? This will lead to one device being unusable (and maybe even worst)...
Please explain what you had in mind ?
> > Best Regards, > J. >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..c87a861 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek_mmc.dts >> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ >> +/* >> + * at91rm9200ek.dts - Device Tree file for Atmel AT91RM9200 evaluation kit with >> + * an MMC slot >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com> >> + * >> + * Licensed under GPLv2 only >> + */ >> +/dts-v1/; >> +#include "at91rm9200ek.dts" >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Atmel AT91RM9200 evaluation kit with MMC slot"; >> + compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200ek-mmc", "atmel,at91rm9200ek", "atmel,at91rm9200"; >> + >> + ahb { >> + apb { >> + mmc0: mmc@fffb4000 { >> + status = "okay"; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >>
| |