Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 10/13] mac80211: Apply rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive | Date | Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:29:43 -0700 |
| |
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu, which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the uses in sta_info_hash_del() are legitimate: They are assigning a pointer to an element from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list are already visible to caller.
This commit therefore silences this false positive by laundering the pointer using rcu_access_pointer() as suggested by Josh Triplett.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org --- net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c index aeb967a0aeed..d18ab89a5725 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int sta_info_hash_del(struct ieee80211_local *local, return -ENOENT; if (s == sta) { rcu_assign_pointer(local->sta_hash[STA_HASH(sta->sta.addr)], - s->hnext); + rcu_access_pointer(s->hnext)); return 0; } @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int sta_info_hash_del(struct ieee80211_local *local, s = rcu_dereference_protected(s->hnext, lockdep_is_held(&local->sta_mtx)); if (rcu_access_pointer(s->hnext)) { - rcu_assign_pointer(s->hnext, sta->hnext); + rcu_assign_pointer(s->hnext, rcu_access_pointer(sta->hnext)); return 0; } -- 1.8.1.5
| |