Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:10:01 -0800 | From | Vinod Koul <> | Subject | Re: [resend][PATCH 03/16] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer function |
| |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:58:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > n 9 January 2013 19:20, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: > >>> +static inline bool is_slave_xfer(enum dma_transfer_direction direction) > >>> +{ > >>> + return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM); > >>> +} > >> After reading the subsequent patch I understand what is intent here. Perhaps > >> is_slave_dirn() would have been a beter one... > > > > dirn isn't readable, it took me some time to understand the intent... > > Either have xfer or direction :) > > Agree with Viresh. I might rename it to is_slave_direction if you want to. direction sounds fine too.
-- ~Vinod
| |