lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IPsec AH use of ahash


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>
> To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: "Tom St Denis" <tstdenis@elliptictech.com>, "David Dillow" <dave@thedillows.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 7:34:41 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > My God, you sound like a 2 year old.
> >
> > Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried
> > about,
> > as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it
> > would have taken you to clean up your work.
>
> It's like you're reading my mind... :-)

The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.

For me to re-write complete statements for coding style reasons means I have to actually go out and test it again. In a proper IPsec lab that can take a couple of hours to make sure it's been run through its paces. That's [among other things] the problem I have. Re-writing perfectly good code because it doesn't meet coding "standards" that nobody else seems to match.

If you guys can't appreciate that I should just bow out of the discussion. I didn't come here looking for a fight I came here to seek reason.

Tom


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-21 02:21    [W:0.921 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site