Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:40:49 -0500 (EST) | From | Tom St Denis <> | Subject | Re: IPsec AH use of ahash |
| |
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de> > To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Cc: "Tom St Denis" <tstdenis@elliptictech.com>, "David Dillow" <dave@thedillows.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > netdev@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 7:34:41 PM > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > My God, you sound like a 2 year old. > > > > Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried > > about, > > as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it > > would have taken you to clean up your work. > > It's like you're reading my mind... :-)
The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
For me to re-write complete statements for coding style reasons means I have to actually go out and test it again. In a proper IPsec lab that can take a couple of hours to make sure it's been run through its paces. That's [among other things] the problem I have. Re-writing perfectly good code because it doesn't meet coding "standards" that nobody else seems to match.
If you guys can't appreciate that I should just bow out of the discussion. I didn't come here looking for a fight I came here to seek reason.
Tom
| |