lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/5] forced comounts for cgroups.
Hello, Peter.

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:06:33AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> *confused* I always thought that was exactly what you meant with unified
> hierarchy.

No, I never counted out differing granularity.

> Doing all this runtime is just going to make the mess even bigger,
> because now we have to deal with even more stupid cases.
>
> So either we go and try to contain this mess as proposed by Glauber or
> we go delete controllers.. I've had it with this crap.

If cpuacct can really go away, that's great, but I don't think the
problem at hand is unsolvable, so let's not jump it. cpuacct and cpu
aren't the onlfy problem cases after all. We need to solve it for
other controllers too.

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-05 11:43    [W:0.140 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site