Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:22:29 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf, Add support for Xeon-Phi PMU |
| |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:05:58PM +0200, stephane eranian wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 15:42 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > > >> Guys, letme re-read this whole mail thread first since I have no clue > >> what this remapping about ;) > > > > x86_setup_perfctr() / set_ext_hw_attr() have special purposed 0 and -1 > > config values to mean -ENOENT and -EINVAL resp. > > > > This means neither config value can be a 'real' event. Now it turns out > > Xeon-Phi has an actual event 0, which is masked by these special case > > thingies. > > Then how about using -1 or -2 for ENOENT and EINVAL?
-2 can't be a valid p4 config as far as i can tell.
| |