Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:11:20 -0700 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them |
| |
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > While I respect your goal of not warning about any configuration > > with max_level = 1, I believe the only sane configuration as soon > > as we get any 2nd-level child is use_hierarchy = 1 for everybody. > > > > Everything aside from it should be warned. > > Defintely. And that what the above guarantess, doesn't it?
I'm getting a bit worried that I might not be fully understanding what your concern is. Can you please elaborate what your worries are and the transition plan that you have in your mind regarding .use_hierarchy?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |