lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v2 1/2] PCI-Express Non-Transparent Bridge Support
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:35:33AM +0800, Jianbin Kang wrote:
> > I've tried to make it all generic enough that non-Intel NTBs should plug in with
> > minimal changes to ntb_hw.c. If their design is too divergent, then a slight
> > redesign of ntb_hw.c might be necessary. But from what I've seen of other
> > designs on the internet, they appear to be extremely similar. The transport and
> > client drivers were written with the hardware abstracted away as much as
> > possible to prevent the need to modify it for different hardware. If there is
> > anything which is Intel hardware specific, I'd be happy to change it to make it
> > more generic.
> In ntb_process_tx(), ntb uses hard-coding 'memcpy_toio' to copy data
> to remote.
> Is it better to provide a function pointer like 'tx()' and call qp->tx().
> memcpy_toio is a slow operation. Some hardware can setup a dma
> transfer and wait.
>
> IMHO, the best way is to handle tx in async mode. But it requires
> lots of modification.

Actually this is what I'm working on now, using async_tx to replace the
memcpy. I believe the changes shouldn't be that significant.

Is the "hardware that can setup dma" you refer to something that does
not use this interface?

Thanks,
Jon


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-31 19:02    [W:0.112 / U:1.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site