Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions | Date | Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:07:47 +0930 |
| |
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:15:25 +0800, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote: > On 05/30/2012 06:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote: > >> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote: > >> > >>> > >>>>>> s/return/Returns > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for comments! > >>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't > >>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set. > >>>> So something like: > >>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style. > >>> Is the following new update patch ok? > >> > >> > >> Any further comments for this patch? :) > > > > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > > Thanks! > Does someone like to pick up this patch? :)
Applied, thanks!
Cheers, Rusty.
| |