Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 May 2012 16:15:25 +0800 | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions |
| |
On 05/30/2012 06:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote: >> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote: >> >>> >>>>>> s/return/Returns >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for comments! >>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't >>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set. >>>> So something like: >>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style. >>> Is the following new update patch ok? >> >> >> Any further comments for this patch? :) > > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Thanks! Does someone like to pick up this patch? :)
| |