Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- "Yan, Zheng"
- Peter Zijlstra
- Peter Zijlstra
- Stephane Eranian
| | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V6 06/13] perf: Add Nehalem and Sandy Bridge uncore support | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:28:27 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:31 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: > @@ -808,6 +994,14 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void) > int ret, cpu; > > switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) { > + case 26: /* Nehalem */ > + case 30: > + case 37: /* Westmere */ > + msr_uncores = nhm_msr_uncores; > + break; > + case 42: /* Sandy Bridge */ > + msr_uncores = snb_msr_uncores; > + break;
What about WSP-EP (44)? Does it have an uncore similar to the regular WSM (37) or WSM-EX / Xeon-E7 (47) ?
NHM-EX and WSM-EX are similar again, and not (yet) supported by these patches, right?
| |