Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:47:27 +0800 | From | "Yan, Zheng" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V6 08/13] perf: Add Sandy Bridge-EP uncore support |
| |
On 06/16/2012 01:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:31 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: >> +static struct event_constraint snbep_uncore_r2pcie_constraints[] = { >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x10, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x11, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x12, 0x1), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x23, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x24, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x25, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x26, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x32, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x33, 0x3), >> + UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x34, 0x3), >> + EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END >> +}; > > My E5-2600 Uncore Perf. Mon. Guide, March 2012 (Ref.# 327043-001) > doesn't seem to list events 0x26 and up. > > I'm staring at 2.8.5, table 2-108. > > Is my document out-dated or what's up? > > the r3qpi table seems to match, but the cbox one is funny again, event > 0x01 doesn't appear in the doc, nor does 0x3b, 0x38, 0x23. > Sorry, my document is out-dated. These events were listed in the old document. should we remove them ?
> FWIW, cbox event constraint 0x1f needs to be an > EVENT_CONSTRAINT_OVERLAP, see the comment near that macro definition. > thanks for reminding
Regards Yan, Zheng
| |