Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Fix comments in mm/memblock.c | From | Li Zhong <> | Date | Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:47:30 +0800 |
| |
Make the parameter names in comments consistent with the actual ones used in the function.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- mm/memblock.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 952123e..76cb09f 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -540,9 +540,9 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) * __next_free_mem_range - next function for for_each_free_mem_range() * @idx: pointer to u64 loop variable * @nid: nid: node selector, %MAX_NUMNODES for all nodes - * @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL - * @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be % NULL - * @p_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL + * @out_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL + * @out_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be % NULL + * @out_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL * * Find the first free area from *@idx which matches @nid, fill the out * parameters, and update *@idx for the next iteration. The lower 32bit of -- 1.7.9.5
| |